书城公版The Miscellaneous Writings and Speeches
38634800000179

第179章 GLADSTONE ON CHURCH AND STATE(5)

We may state the same proposition in a more general form, in which it surely must command universal assent.Wherever there is power in the universe, that power is the property of God, the King of that universe--his property of right, however for a time withholden or abused.Now this property is, as it were, realised, is used according to the will of the owner, when it is used for the purposes he has ordained, and in the temper of mercy, justice, truth, and faith which he has taught us.But those principles never can be truly, never can be permanently entertained in the human breast, except by a continual reference to their source, and the supply of the Divine grace.The powers, therefore, that dwell in individuals acting as a government as well as those that dwell in individuals acting for themselves, can only he secured for right uses by applying to them a religion."Here are propositions of vast and indefinite extent, conveyed in language which has a certain obscure dignity and sagacity, attractive, we doubt not, to many minds.But the moment that we examine these propositions closely, the moment that we bring them to the test by running over but a very few of the particulars which are included in them, we find them to be false and extravagant.The doctrine which "must surely command universal assent" is this, that every association of human beings which exercises any power whatever, that is to say, every association of human beings, is bound, as such association, to profess a religion.Imagine the effect which would follow if this principle were really in force during four-and-twenty hours.Take one instance out of a million.A stage-coach company has power over its horses.This power is the property of God.It is used according to the will of God when it is used with mercy.But the principle of mercy can never be truly or permanently entertained in the human breast without continual reference to God.The powers, therefore, that dwell in individuals, acting as a stage-coach company, can only be secured for right uses by applying to them a religion.Every stage coach company ought, therefore, in its collective capacity, to profess some one faith, to have its articles, and its public worship, and its tests.That this conclusion, and an infinite number of other conclusions equally strange, follow of necessity from Mr.Gladstone's principle, is as certain as it is that two and two make four.And, if the legitimate conclusions be so absurd, there must be something unsound in the principle.

We will quote another passage of the same sort: