But some good and Christian men have been put to the torture, that they might be forced to deliver up their goods to the enemy.They could indeed neither deliver nor lose that good which made themselves good.If, however, they preferred torture to the surrender of the mammon of iniquity, then I say they were not good men.Rather they should have been reminded that, if they suffered so severely for the sake of money, they should endure all torment, if need be, for Christ's sake; that they might be taught to love Him rather who enriches with eternal felicity all who suffer for Him, and not silver and gold, for which it was pitiable to suffer, whether they preserved it by telling a lie or lost it by telling the truth.For under these tortures no one lost Christ by confessing Him, no one preserved wealth save by denying its existence.So that possibly the torture which taught them that they should set their affections on a possession they could not lose, was more useful than those possessions which, without any useful fruit at all, disquieted and tormented their anxious owners.But then we are reminded that some were tortured who had no wealth to surrender, but who were not believed when they said so.These too, however, had perhaps some craving for wealth, and were not willingly poor with a holy resignation;and to such it had to be made plain, that not the actual possession alone, but also the desire of wealth, deserved such excruciating pains.And even if they were destitute of any hidden stores of gold and silver, because they were living in hopes of a better life,--I know not indeed if any such person was tortured on the supposition that he had wealth; but if so, then certainly in confessing, when put to the question, a holy poverty, he confessed Christ.And though it was scarcely to be expected that the barbarians should believe him, yet no confessor of a holy poverty could be tortured without receiving a heavenly reward.
Again, they say that the long famine laid many a Christian low.But this, too, the faithful turned to good uses by a pious endurance of it.For those whom famine killed outright it rescued from the ills of this life, as a kindly disease would have done;and those who were only hunger-bitten were taught to live more sparingly, and inured to longer fasts.
CHAP.11.--OF THE END OF THIS LIFE, WHETHER IT IS MATERIAL THAT IT BELONG DELAYED.
But, it is added, many Christians were slaughtered, and were put to death in a hideous variety of cruel ways.Well, if this be hard to bear, it is assuredly the common lot of all who are born into this life.Of this at least I am certain, that no one has ever died who was not destined to die some time.Now the end of life puts the longest life on a par with the shortest.For of two things which have alike ceased to be, the one is not better, the other worse--the one greater, the other less.(1) And of what consequence is it what kind of death puts an end to life, since he who has died once is not forced to go through the same ordeal a second time? And as in the daily casualties of life every man is, as it were, threatened with numberless deaths, so long as it remains uncertain which of them is his fate, I would ask whether it is not better to suffer one and die, than to live in fear of all? I am not unaware of the poor-spirited fear which prompts us to choose rather to live long in fear of so many deaths, than to die once and so escape them all; but the weak and cowardly shrinking of the flesh is one thing, and the well-considered and reasonable persuasion of the soul quite another.That death is not to be judged an evil which is the end of a good life; for death becomes evil only by the retribution which follows it.They, then, who are destined to die, need not be careful to inquire what death they are to die, but into what place death will usher them.And since Christians are well aware that the death of the godly pauper whose sores the dogs licked was far better than of the wicked rich man who lay in purple and fine linen, what harm could these terrific deaths do to the dead who had lived well?
CHAP.12.--OF THE BURIAL OF THE DEAD: THAT THE DENIAL OF IT TO CHRISTIANSDOES THEM
NO INJURY.(2)
Further still, we are reminded that in such a carnage as then occurred, the bodies could not even be buried.But godly confidence is not appalled by so ill-omened a circumstance; for the faithful bear in mind that assurance has been given that not a hair of their head shall perish, and that, therefore, though they even be devoured by beasts, their blessed resurrection will not hereby be hindered.The Truth would nowise have said, "Fear not them which kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul,"(3) if anything whatever that an enemy could do to the body of the slain could be detrimental to the future life.Or will some one perhaps take so absurd a position as to contend that those who kill the body are not to be feared before death, and lest they kill the body, but after death, lest they deprive it of burial? If this be so, then that is false which Christ says, "Be not afraid of them that kill the body, and after that have no more that they can do;"(4) for it seems they can do great injury to the dead body.Far be it from us to suppose that the Truth can be thus false.They who kill the body are said "to do something," because the deathblow is felt, the body still having sensation; but after that, they have no more that they can do, for in the slain body there is no sensation.