"Well," said he, "let us take one of our units of management, a commune, or a ward, or a parish (for we have all three names, indicating little real distinction between them now, though time was there was a good deal). In such a district, as you would call it, some neighbours think that something ought to be done or undone: a new town-hall built; a clearance of inconvenient houses; or say a stone bridge substituted for some ugly old iron one,--there you have undoing and doing in one. Well, at the next ordinary meeting of the neighbours, or Mote, as we call it, according to the ancient tongue of the times before bureaucracy, a neighbour proposes the change and of course, if everybody agrees, there is an end of discussion except about details. Equally, if no one backs the proposer--`seconds him,'
it used to be called--the matter drops for the time being; a thing not likely to happen amongst reasonable menk however, as the propose is sure to have talked it over with others before the Mote. But supposingr the affair proposed and seconded, if a few of the neighbours disagree to it, if they think that the beastly iron bridge will serve a little longer and they don['t want to be bothered with building a new one just then, they don't count heads that time, but put off the formal discussion to the next Mote; and meantimer arguments _pro_ and _con_ are flying about, and some get printed, so that everybody knows what is going on; and when the Mote comes together again there is a regular discusssion and at last a vote by show of hands. If the division is a close one, the question is again put off for further discussion; if t4he division is a wide one, the minority are asked if they will yield to the more general opinion, which they often, nay, most commonly do. If they refuse, the question is debated a third time, when, if the minority has not perceptibly grown, they always give way; though I believe there is some half-forgotten rule by which they might still carry it on further; but I say, what always happens is that they are comvoinced not perhaps tht their view is the wrong one, but they cannot persuade or force the community to adopt it.""Very good," said I; "but what happens if the divisions are still narrow?"Said he: "As a matter of principle and according to the rule of such cases, the question must then lapse, and the majority, if so narrow, has to submit to sitting down under the _status quo_. But I must tell you that in point of fact the minority very seldom enforces this rule, but generally yields in a friendly manner.""But do you know," said I, "that there is something in all this very like democracy; and I thought that democracy was considered to be in a moribund condition many, many years ago."The old boy's eyes twinkled. "I grant you that our methods have that drawback. But what is to be done? We can't get _any one_ amongst us to complain of his not always having his own way in the teeth of the community, when it is clear that _everybody_ cannot have that indulgence. What _is_ to be done?""Well," said I, "I don't know."Said he: " The only alternatives to our method that I can concieve of are these. First, that we should choose out, or breed, a class of superior persons capable of judging on all matters without consulting the neighbours; that, in short, we whould get for ourselves what used to be called an aristocracy of intellect; or, secondly, that for the purpose of safe-guarding the ******* of the individual will we should revert to a system of private property again, and have slaves and slave-holders once more. What do you think of those two expedients?""Well,"said I, "there is a third possibility--to wit, that every man should be quite independent of every other and that thus the tyranny of society should be abolished."He looked hard at me for a second or two, and then burst out laughing very heartily; and I confess that I joined him. When he recovered himself he nodded at me, and said:"Yes, yes, i quite agree with you--and so we all do.""Yes," I said, "and besides, it does not press hardly on the minority:
for, take this matter of the bridge, no man is obliged to woek on it if he doesn't agree to its building. At least I suppose not."He smiled, and said: "Shrewdly put; and yet from the point of view of another planet. If the mam of the minority does find his feelings hurt, doubtless he may relieve them by refusing to help in building the bridge. But, dear neighbour, that is not a very effective salve for the wound caused by the `tyranny of a majority' in our society;because all work that is done is either beneficial or hurtful to every member of the society. The man is benefited by the bridge-building if it turns out a good thing, and hurt by it if it turns out a bad one, whether he puts a hand to it or not; and meanwhile he iss benefiting the bridge-builders by his work, whatever that may be. In fact, I see no help for him except the pleasure of saying `I told you so' if the bridge-building turns out to be a mistake and hurts him; if it benefits him he must suffer in silence. A terrible tyranny our Communism, is it not? Folk used often to be warned against this bery unhappiness in times past, when for every well-fed, contented person you saw a thousand miserable starvelings. Whereas for us, we grow fat and well-liking on the tyranny; a tyranny, to say the truth, not to be made visible by any to seek for troubles by calling our peace and plenty and happiness by ill names whose very meaning we have forgotten!"He sat musing for a little, and then started and said: "Are there any more questions, dear guest? The morning is waning fast amidst my garrulity."